Saturday, November 23, 2013

Copyright Contributes $1 Trillion to the U.S. Economy


Copyright industries added over $1 trillion in value to the U.S. economy in a single year, accounting for almost 6.5% of the total U.S. GDP, according to a new study released today by the International Intellectual Property Alliance® (IIPA®). The study tracks the economic impact and contributions of U.S. industries creating, producing, distributing, broadcasting or exhibiting copyright materials, including computer software, videogames, books, newspapers, periodicals and journals, motion pictures, music, and radio and television programming.

The study, Copyright Industries in the U.S. Economy: The 2013 Report, was prepared by Stephen E. Siwek of Economists Incorporated for the IIPA, and updates 13 previous studies. It is based on data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and other government agencies and it demonstrates the vibrancy of copyright and creativity as an engine for growth for the U.S. economy. In reaction to the study, Representative Judy Chu, co-chair of the Congressional Creative Rights Caucus, said: “This study demonstrates that not only do U.S. copyright industries develop the creative works that inspire and entertain so many, they also provide high paying jobs and spur economic activity, consistently contributing to a trade surplus and adding substantial value to our GDP."- IIPA

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Remuneration in IPR-intensive Industries is More Than 40% Higher

The European Commission today welcomed the publication of a study on Intellectual Property Rights, which was carried out jointly by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM). This study, “Intellectual Property Rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in Europe” (September 2013), measures the importance of Intellectual Property (IP) rights in the EU economy. Key findings of the study are that about 39% of total economic activity in the EU (worth some €4.7 trillion annually) is generated by IPR-intensive industries, and approximately 26% of all employment in the EU (56 million jobs) is provided directly by these industries, while a further 9% of jobs in the EU stems indirectly from IPR-intensive industries.

Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier said: "I am convinced that intellectual property rights play a hugely important role in stimulating innovation and creativity. What this study shows us is that the use of intellectual property rights in the economy is ubiquitous: from high-tech industries to manufacturers of sports goods, toys and computer games, all are making intensive use of not just one, but often several types of intellectual property rights.”

Benoît Battistelli, President of the European Patent Office (EPO) said: "This report shows that the benefit of patents and other IPRs is not just economic theory. For innovative companies intangible assets have become extremely important. Especially for SMEs, but also research centres and universities, patents often open the door to capital and business partners. In order to remain competitive in the global economy, Europe needs to encourage even further the development and use of new technology and innovations."

António Campinos, President of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM) said: “This study is the result of a detailed collaboration between experts drawn from different agencies and countries, using a transparent and replicable methodology. It tackles the fundamental question of the extent to which IPR-related industries matter to jobs, GDP and trade in the EU. We now have a clear answer. They do matter, they matter a lot.”

The study focuses on the EU economy and considers IPR-intensive industries as either those that register more Intellectual Property Rights per employee than other industries, or those where the use of IPR is an intrinsic characteristic of the industry’s activity. These industries are selected at EU-level, i.e. using EU-wide measures of IPR intensity.

The study also finds that:

Average remuneration in IPR-intensive industries is more than 40% higher than in other industries;

Examples of IPR-intensive industries include:

the manufacture of power-driven hand tools (patents);

the manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products (trademarks);

the manufacture of watches and clocks (designs);

book publishing (copyright); and

operation of dairies and cheese making (geographical indications).

Hundreds of industries, as diverse as services activities related to financial services and insurance, advertising agencies, ice cream manufacture, wallpaper manufacture, wine production, electric lighting and domestic appliances, satellite telecommunications, and extraction of oil and gas are also all IPR-intensive, and many make simultaneous use of more than one IP right.

A list of all IPR-intensive industries is included in the Appendix to the report.

This study comes on foot of a broadly similar exercise carried out in 2012 by the US Patent and Trademark Office together with the Economics and Statistics Administration, which reached comparable findings for the US economy as the OHIM/EPO study has done for the EU economy. - European Commission

Friday, September 13, 2013

Geographic​al Indication Regulation​s 2000 (Amendment 2013)

The Geographical Indication Regulations 2000 (Amendment 2013) was amended on 15th July 2013. A notice was issued by the Registrar of Geographical Indications to include provisions regarding eligibility, enrolment and renewal of geographical agent; renewal of registered geographical indications; and reinstatement of registered geographical indications. Hence, IP practitioners interested in providing service as geographical indication agent will have to be registered with the Registry as an agent. Forms and fees involved is also updated. The notice of amendment is available at www.myipo.gov.my

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

"Learn the PCT" Video Series


Learn the PCT is a series of 29 short videos (approximately 15 minutes each) presented by Matthias Reischle, Deputy Director, PCT Legal Division, WIPO. The series is designed to provide a basic introduction to important aspects and issues in the international phase and national phase of PCT processing.

This series closely follows material covered during basic PCT training seminars and will be particularly useful for those who have not attended such seminars in person, for small and medium-sized enterprises, and for PCT users and potential users in developing and least-developed countries.

The total running time for the series is six hours and 15 minutes. - WIPO

Sunday, August 4, 2013

The History of Logo Design

The History of Logo Design
Explore more infographics like this one on the web's largest information design community - Visually.



How Startup Valuation Works –A Way To Measure a Company’s Potential

How Startup Valuation Works �A Way To Measure a Company�s Potential
by annavital.
Explore more infographics like this one on the web's largest information design community - Visually.




Sunday, July 21, 2013

MIPA Trademark Symposium

MIPA is organising a Trademark Symposium titled 'Malaysian Landscape for Trademark Evolution' on 25/07/2013.

This Symposium brings together industry experts from various backgrounds such as an IP owner, an IP and Trademark agent and the head of a Trademark section.

Aimed at Entrepreneurs, Investors, IP Agents, Legal Experts, Government Agencies and Corporates with IP Trademarks & Patents, this Symposium provides the perfect platform for IP owners and IP practitioners to discuss issues related to trademark branding.

Various topics will be discussed during this half-day Symposium including the dilemma of uniqueness for trademark and branding, acceptable and unacceptable trademarks and the challenges faced by brand owners. I am invited as one of the speaker.

For more information, follow this link